GIPS® Standards Do’s & Don’ts

GIPS® Standards Do’s and Don’ts

First Quarter 2019 is almost half over.  Now is a great time for an in-depth review and refresh of firm-wide GIPS standards policies and procedures, especially for firms on an annual verification cycle.

Here’s a list of Do’s and Don’ts to help with those P&P reviews and final polishing of GIPS Composite Reports.

DO                                             DON’T

DO provide a compliant presentation to all prospective clients prior to or along with any other performance related inform
Add desktop procedures to effectively support this policy?
DON’T include inappropriate claims of GIPS verification/compliance.
Add as a compliance annual training point for your marketing team?
DO consider Consultant databases/RFPs as a prospective client and provide a compliant presentation. DON’T reference performance as GIPS compliant; the claim of compliance applies to the firm.
DO confirm all required disclosures are included in compliant presentations. DON’T use the term audited performance when referring to a firm-wide verification.
DO update the “verification through” date on the firm’s compliant presentations and policy & procedure document after each verification opinion is issued. DON’T present partial period performance for new/closed composites without also disclosing the period it represents.
DO disclose all material events/changes to the firm and composites. Consider/discuss with PMs any disclosure that might need to be added due to significant events? DON’T link performance periods that have a gap between them.
Are visual separations of different periods effective/not misleading?
DO link performance from a prior firm if it meets ALL portability requirements. DON’T link performance from a prior firm unless it meets ALL portability requirements.
DO clearly label model/representative account data as “supplemental” if it’s on the compliant presentation. DON’T link hypothetical and actual performance.
DO disclose the most appropriate fee schedule for prospective clients. Agree to ADV to capture any updates? DON’T use model fees that could result in composite net performance that is better than actual net of fee performance.
DO apply a consistent policy for the inclusion/exclusion of new/closed accounts in firm and composite year-end assets. Do GIPS standards firm AUM and ADV AUM reconcile? DON’T change the benchmark presented without including required disclosures.
DO keep a record of prospective clients who have received compliant presentations, to: Confirm provision at least annually, andAppropriately limit redistribution in the event of a material error. DON’T disregard local laws or regulations; they must be followed in addition to the GIPS standards requirements.

Questions/Comments? Contact Us: 503-887-5842   https://cascadecompliance.com/

Money-Weighted Returns in Excel

Beyond “Don’t Use” – How (Not) to Calculate Money-Weighted Returns in Excel

If cost was of no matter, then asset managers would all own (fill in the blank with your favorite accounting system).  For emerging asset management firms, cost does matter.  When managing a start-up commingled fund, an investment firm only needs to calculate a single return stream to comply with best practices in the GIPS®  standards.  It’s hard to justify a six-figure expense when Microsoft Excel is free, never mind the pitfalls.

Read more

Multi-Asset Composite Membership Changes – GIPS® 2020

In the 2020 GIPS Exposure Draft, provision 3.A.10 is a revision of 3.A.7 that incorporates the term “client-directed” from the GIPS handbook. It prohibits composite membership changes unless there is a composite redefinition or a documented “client-directed” change to a portfolio’s investment mandate, objective, or strategy.

This provision ensures an asset manager’s decisions are reflected in the composite’s performance, providing accountability for tactical decisions or style drift over time.

Read more

Advisory Only Assets – Understanding New GIPS® Terminology

The roll-out of 2020 GIPS® is underway and currently open for comment.  One of the more confusing provisions in the exposure draft is the proposed requirement to report Advisory Only Assets separate from GIPS Firm assets.

This 2020 GIPS provision is not a big departure from prior guidance.  It is important, however, to understand if you and your colleagues—and regulators—use the term “advisory only” assets differently than it is used in the 2020 GIPS Glossary.  This article will define the terminology and help you assess the impact of the new terminology for your firm, if any.  We’ll also line up the GIPS terminology with regulatory assets under management and provide clarifying examples.

Read more

GIPS® Compliance, Marathons & Significant Events

A GIPS Disclosure Analogy

I’ve been helping firms become GIPS compliant and have been running marathons for over 20 years, and last month, I just ran my fastest half marathon ever.  The marathon was an inaugural Mt. Hood Revel run, and my husband was getting texts during the event tracking my bib number:

“One quarter done with a pace of 8:05 min/mile. Projected finish time of 3:33:26.41 at 9:05AM.”

Read more