This author has not written his bio yet.
But we are proud to say that Janice Kitzman contributed 12 entries already.
While it may seem that Ted Lasso and the Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS®) have nothing in common, we found important similarities between this feel-good show and the GIPS Standards.
One of the more common questions we get asked by firms is whether they should use model or actual fees to calculate net-of-fee composite returns. With the soon-to-be-implemented SEC Marketing Rule requirements for net-of-fee composite performance calculations, many firms will need to reconsider their current calculation methodology to make the best decision going forward.
Now that it is a regulatory requirement, we are working with private equity/venture capital firms to review their IRR calculations and marketing decks to ensure they meet the requirements established in the FINRA 20-21 notice.
Looking for a little distraction to kick-start the spring? We are highlighting five top performance Q&A’s focused on pooled fund expenses.
1. Someone said that the expense ratio should be annualized. What is the source for this requirement?
Einstein said to make mistakes, because that’s how we learn and grow. And we all make them. That’s why the GIPS Standards include error correction requirements to provide transparency in reporting after a material error has been made. Below are our answers to error correction questions from attendees at this past year’s GIPS Conference.
With the finalization of 2020 performance, most marketing departments are completing their presentations. We have compiled pertinent questions from the GIPS Annual Conference to help compliant firms create marketing materials […]